Free Energy
Physicists refer to something called the ‘Laws of
Dynamics’. The first law is often stated thus: ‘Energy cannot be created nor destroyed’.
What this means is that all we can do is to change energy from one form to another.
For example, when you burn fuel in a car you release energy by means of a chemical
reaction (the oxidisation of the petrol). This heat is converted to mechanical
energy and moves the car. The energy eventually finishes up as heat again. We
haven't actually created energy, we have simply changed it from on form another.
The problem with this simplistic ‘law’ is that although it may be true on a universal
scale, it is not true on a small scale. For example, a photo-electric cell produces
electricity from sunlight. Although it simply converts energy, if you are camping
and you have such a device to produce electricity it appears as if the energy
is being created out of nowhere – you don't have to pay for it or replenish it.
The reason this is relevant is in the issue of devices that are referred to as
‘over-unity’, that is, they produce more energy than they apparently consume.
I've mentioned these devices before (‘Zero-Point Energy’) but there is a lot of
confusion over this subject. Conventional physicists treat the subject of over-unity
with skepticism and simply deny the possibility of such devices, the reason being
that they apparently go against the first law of thermodynamics. However, this
is only an apparent phenomenon as is comparable with thinking that a photocell
produces energy from nowhere. The energy actually comes from something called
‘zero-point’ energy.
One type of over-unity devices are those that use magnets. Conventional physicists
maintain that magnetic energy is like the energy in a spring or a battery. You
can use the magnet to attract an object but then you have to use a similar amount
of energy to remove it again. The net result is that you can’t use the magnet
to do work. However there is a fundamental difference between a magnet and a spring
or a battery and that is that the magnet doesn't need to be replenished: it doesn't
become uncoiled like a spring or run down like a battery.
Now, suppose we had a metal bar with a simple characteristic. By doing something to it, for example by heating it up slightly or by inducing a small electric current in it, we can demagnetize it temporally. Now we have a possible over-unity motor. We magnetise our bar and it attracts a piece of steel which we use to drive a wheel, we then demagnetise it and we pull the metal away, magnetise the bar and pull it in again and so on.
Of course this is not necessarily over unity as it depends on how much energy
we need to magnetise or demagnetize our metal. Bar. Conventional electro magnets
don't cut the mustard.
Conventional physicists argue that this design will never produce an over-unity motor. Not because they have evidence but simply because they think that to accept the possibility is to disregard the first law of thermodynamics. However, this is not the case. The energy comes from the zero-point energy, a vast amount of energy available in what used to be called the Ether.
More information is available here:
